Best car insurance recommendations 2023

 As we enter a new year, it's important to reevaluate our car insurance policies to ensure we're getting the best coverage at the best price. With so many options on the market, it can be overwhelming to choose the right one. That's why we've compiled a list of the best car insurance recommendations for 2023 to help you make an informed decision.


GEICO




GEICO has consistently been ranked as one of the best car insurance providers in the industry. They offer competitive rates, excellent customer service, and a user-friendly mobile app that makes managing your policy a breeze. GEICO also offers a range of discounts, including multi-policy, multi-car, and safe driver discounts, which can help you save even more on your premiums.


State Farm

State Farm is another top-rated car insurance provider that offers comprehensive coverage options and personalized customer service. They also have a user-friendly mobile app that allows you to manage your policy and file claims easily. State Farm also offers a range of discounts, including safe driver, good student, and anti-theft device discounts, which can help you save on your premiums.


Progressive

Progressive is a popular choice for car insurance, thanks to their competitive rates and unique coverage options. They offer a range of policies, including liability, collision, and comprehensive coverage, as well as optional extras like rental car reimbursement and roadside assistance. Progressive also offers a variety of discounts, including safe driver, multi-policy, and online quote discounts.


Allstate

Allstate is another top-rated car insurance provider that offers a range of coverage options and excellent customer service. They also have a user-friendly mobile app that allows you to manage your policy and file claims easily. Allstate offers a range of discounts, including multi-policy, multi-car, and safe driver discounts, as well as discounts for good students and seniors.


Nationwide

Nationwide is a well-known car insurance provider that offers comprehensive coverage options and excellent customer service. They also have a user-friendly mobile app that allows you to manage your policy and file claims easily. Nationwide offers a range of discounts, including safe driver, multi-policy, and anti-theft device discounts, which can help you save on your premiums.


In conclusion, choosing the right car insurance provider can be a daunting task, but it's important to take the time to find the right one for you. These top-rated car insurance providers offer comprehensive coverage options, competitive rates, and excellent customer service, making them excellent choices for 2023. Remember to shop around and compare quotes to ensure you're getting the best deal on your car insurance policy.

Cheapest Auto Insurance in Michigan, Best 5 Providers

Car Junkie - Cheapest Auto Insurance in Michigan - Michigan isn't really a large state, so for this we didn't get serious problems in collecting data. After we did an observation then organized the date as good as possible before performing it. From our analysis, auto insurance rates in Michigan are also quiet varying from one town to another like in other states. Get in here to find out the best auto insurance companies in New Jersey. 

cheapest car insurance in michigan
progressive auto insurance Michigan reviews

When it goes to cheap car insurance in Michigan and wondering who or which company provides us the most inexpensive quotes in the state, we'd recommend you to consider Hastings Mutual as the first choice. The company seems to charge its customers under the average as competitors do. For taking a one-year full coverage of premium package, you'll only pay around $550. Indeed, that figure is far cheaper if we compare to minimum rates in big states like Florida, California and the like.

We've decided to put Chubb as a Michigan auto insurance into the list as the second cheapest car insurer in the State of Michigan. Based on the average rate, the data shows that this provider has been offering us very competitive costs. It's about $200 more expensive than our first option.

3 more companies with cheapest car insurance in Michigan include; Nationwide, National General and Pioneer State Mutual. Look at the chart below to study the average rates.

  1. Pioneer State Mutual (annual rate: $1,090)
  2. National General (annual rate: $1,000)
  3. Nationwide (annual rate: $890)
  4. Chubb Insurance Company (annual rate: $760)
  5. Hastings Mutual (annual rate: $550)

The data showed above is collected based on the average quotes. Next we've another list based on cities throughout Michigan State.

Cheapest Michigan Car Insurance Based on Cities


  • Flint: Hastings Mutual ($610), Chubb ($794), Nationwide ($949).
  • Detroit: Hastings Mutual ($760), Farm Bureau ($1,127), Chubb ($1,165).
  • Warren: Hastings Mutual ($599), Chubb ($680), Nationwide ($739).
  • Livonia: Hastings Mutual ($535), Nationwide ($730), Chubb ($746).
  • Lansing: Hastings Mutual ($439), Chubb ($650), Nationwide ($655).
  • Dearborn: Hastings Mutual ($575), Nationwide ($659), Chubb ($965).
  • Westland: Hastings Mutual ($535), Nationwide ($763), Chubb ($799).
  • Ann Arbor: Hastings Mutual ($439), Chubb ($569), National General ($625).
  • Grand Rapids: Hastings Mutual ($479), Farm Bureau ($580), Nationwide ($610).
  • Sterling Heights: Hastings Mutual ($529), Nationwide ($670), Chubb ($734).

Our top choice seems to be the best in all cities, since the company always wins the game in terms of providing cheap auto insurance in Michigan. While for second to third options are quiet varying. To get recent quotes of auto insurance in Michigan, please feel free to contact us we'd love to inform you.

Cheapest Auto Insurance in NJ (New Jersey)

We're struggling to answer your question, "Who has the cheapest auto insurance in New Jersey?" Our research began at the beginning of this month and just two days ago we've gained the results. For daily drivers, turns out that based on the average rates, NJ Skylands is the cheapest auto insurance in NJ. While for educators/teachers and all educational community members, we'd recommend to pick Teachers Auto insurance company.

To have a one-year full coverage auto insurance with the lowest one, you'll need at least pay over $1000. Our list, however,  includes 5 best companies available in New Jersey. It means that drivers really have other choices of top insurers around the state. You may also want to know: top car insurance co companies in Florida.

cheapest auto insurance in new jersey
cheapest full coverage auto insurance quotes in New Jersey (NJ)

5 Companies with Cheapest Auto Insurance Quotes in 2015


  • GEICO: annual quote: $1,521
  • Plymouth Rock: annual quote: $1,484
  • Nofolk & Dedham: annual quote: $1,440
  • Farmers: annual quote: $1,298
  • NJ Skylands: annual quote: $1,210

You might have often discovered that GEICO was always there in the top 5 of our older projects and you become familiar with that company, it's just a recognizable fact. From the top-down data, GEICO sits at the line 1, tough not the lowest one, but it's one of our best option today.

Followed by Playmouth Rock with $1,484 of average cost for one-year coverage - our new entry now. More affordable one we have also an unfamiliar provider here called Nofolk & Dedham. The company offers fairly inexpensive costs to insure your new cars. Farmers, comes as the runner-up that costs you not too expensive compared to the previous companies.

Here it is! Our best car insurance in NJ for 2015. The cost might not be as cheap as we expect before in which we're really looking for the best one with excellent cost under $1000. Now let's move to our next date to compare one by one by cities.

Compare Car Insurance Rates in Ohio for 2015

Cheapest Full Coverage Auto Insurance in New Jersey (NJ) Based on Cities


  1. Lakewood - NJ: Farmers ($1,154), NJ Skylands ($1,189),  Norfolk & Dedham ($1,293).
  2. Bayonee - NJ: NJ Skylands ($1,154), Farmers ($1,206), Plymouth Rock ($1,334).
  3. Pennsauken - NJ: NJ Skylands ($1,242), Farmers ($1,298), Norfolk & Dedham ($1,380).
  4. Bloomfield - NJ: NJ Skylands ($1,263), Farmers ($1,317), GEICO ($1,363).
  5. Jersey City - NJ: NJ Skylands ($1,303), Farmers ($1,401), Norfolk & Dedham ($1,485).
  6. Union City - NJ: NJ Skylands ($1,352), Farmers ($1,541), Norfolk & Dedham ($1,704).
  7. Passaic- NJ: NJ Skylands ($1,404), Farmers ($1,541), Norfolk & Dedham ($1,770).
  8. Camden - NJ: NJ Skylands ($1,404), Farmers ($1,541), Norfolk & Dedham ($1,765).
  9. Peterson - NJ: NJ Skylands ($1,422), Farmers ($1,541), Norfolk & Dedham ($1,643).
  10. East Orange - NJ: NJ Skylands ($1,432), Farmers ($1,541), Norfolk & Dedham ($1,651).

Those are our ten best auto insurers around New Jersey that have been offering more affordable rates among others. Contact us to get free quotes for unlisted cities. More information: cheap auto insurance quotes in Texas.

5 Companies with Cheapest Auto Insurance in Texas to Consider

Car Junkie - Cheapest Auto Insurance Texas for 2015. It's pretty hard to set up an observation in big cities such as Texas, with almost 1000 cities and populated by nearly 27 residents, we've tried to analyze the average of auto insurance rates in Texas. The result is a bit surprising, since there are big differences in quotes among the cheapest and most expensive ones.

In this post we'd let you know who/which companies have the cheapest car insurance in Texas for an annual charge. We'll include at least 5 top providers that are offering full coverage with most affordable quotes. More post to read: Cheapest Car Insurance in Florida.

Truth is, the USAA insurance company comes as the cheapest around. To insure your car in USAA, you'll only have to pay less than $500 a year. And as usual we have other options as well. Let's see our data below.

5 Cheapest Auto Insurance Companies in Texas


  1. GEICO - annual quote: $687
  2. Farmers - annual quote: $667
  3. Foremost - annual quote: $655
  4. Allstate - annual quote: $590
  5. USAA - annual quote : $499

From the top 5 to top 1, turns out that USAA provides you the lowest cost in average. But remember, USAA covers military members and their families only. So you don't belong with them, just let it go. In many states, USAA has well known for the best car insurance for military members.

Allstate company wins in average after USAA, and it serves all general occupants. It's true that, probably, you won't find any car insurance companies in Texas with annual cost under $500 of premium package. So this is the only choice to consider as the best among others.

Besides, when you've ever had unpleasant experiences with that company, or your friends have had, Foremost is another one we recommend. They won't charge you so higher compared to Allstate. $50 doesn't mean a lot to you, right?

Furthermore, other outstanding insurance companies such as Farmers, GEICO and AAA Texas are worth selecting. The AAA Texas, however, obliges their customers to have AAA memberships.


cheapest car insurance in texas
cheapest auto/car insurance Texas with the most affordable quotes for really inexpensive cost - reviews

As normal, the rates will differ from one city to another. So it's wise to learn the wide range of rates in some cities to know better.

Best Auto Insurance Companies in Texas Based on Cities


  1. Midland - Texas: Allstate ($560/year), TX Farm Bureau ($579/year), AAA Texas ($615/year).
  2. Brownsville - Texas: Allstate ($610/year), Foremost ($712/year), Fireman's Fund ($745/year).
  3. Odessa - Texas: Foremost ($640/year), Farmers Auto ($646/year), Direct General ($660/year).
  4. Arlington - Texas: Nationwide ($652/year), Allstate ($690/year), Fireman's Fund ($745/year).
  5. McKinney- Texas: Allstate ($720/year), Foremost ($750/year), GEICO ($754/year).
  6. McAllen - Texas: Direct General ($745/year), Foremost ($779/year), Allstate ($799/year).
  7. Austin - Texas: GEICO ($750/year), Foremost ($777/year), Allstate ($780/year).
  8. Dallas - Texas: Allstate ($786/year), Foremost ($780/year), Direct General ($840/year).
  9. San Antonio - Texas: Allstate ($786/year), Foremost ($800/year), Direct General ($840/year).
  10. Houston - Texas: Allstate ($810/year), Foremost ($846/year), GEICO ($855/year).

We only include 10 cities to our database, so if your city doesn't exist, please contact us to update the quotes. Do more analysis and find more references to get the best, cheapest auto insurance in Texas for your vehicles, good luck! You may also be interested in this: Best Auto Insurance in Ohio.

Cheapest Auto Insurance in Florida (5 Top Companies)

Florida, as one of the biggest state, has fairly higher cost of auto insurance. Today Car Junkie will show you who/which company has the cheapest auto insurance in Florida. Since differences very often occur in many cases, we'd like to include at least 5 most affordable providers along the state.

When it comes to the average rates, the Florida Farm Bureau Insurance has indeed offering the cheapest quotes in any cities. The second line however tends quite varying. Here's our study on average car insurance rates in Florida. Also find out the 10 Cheapest Auto Insurance Companies in Ohio.

  1. State Farm - annual quote: $645
  2. Travelers - annual quote: $638
  3. GEICO - annual quote: $603
  4. USAA - annual quote: $599
  5. FL Bureau Insurance - annual quote: $380

See! Providers listed above are our top 5 of the most affordable car insurance in Florida proved by quotes offered, and it's the average rates based on the whole cities. FL Bureau comes as the only one with an annual cost less than $500, as well as the most affordable quotes for all.

USAA, second best with only $599 of a full-year coverage rate. About $200 more expensive compared to the first choice, but that extra cost you pay will give you additional services such as gap coverage and international drivers license.

Third place, GEICO, almost always sits in the top 5 most affordable car insurance companies in the United States. Now it holds the third line in Florida. Very best choice especially for annual coverage under $1000.

Providing just a few tens of dollars higher than GEICO, Travelers insurance company is also one of the most popular in Florida. For under $1000 rate, Travelers will suit you in any way.

Want more option? The last choice here we have State Farm which still offers us low cost. In addition to its popularity for most trusted property insurance, the company takes part in the auto insurance competition as well.

So they're the 5 best auto insurance companies available in Florida based on the average rates.

cheapest car insurance florida
cheap car/auto insurance quotes in Florida

To complete our study, let's go on the following data containing auto insurance rates based on cities.

  1. Fort Lauderdale - Florida (annual rate): FL Farm Bureau ($644), GEICO ($970), Travelers ($990).
  2. Pembroke Pines - Florida (annual rate): FL Farm Bureau ($644), GEICO ($968), State Farm ($990).
  3. Miami - FLorida (annual rate): FL Farm Bureau ($591), GEICO ($1,235), Travelers ($1,515).
  4. Hialeah - Florida (annual rate): FL Farm Bureau ($590), GEICO ($1,235), Travelers ($1,416).
  5. Tampa - Florida (annual rate): FL Farm Bureau ($555), Travelers ($930), GEICO ($831).
  6. St. Petersburg - Florida (annual rate): FL Farm Bureau ($517), GEICO ($792), Travelers ($838).
  7. Fort St.Lucie - Florida (annual rate): FL Farm Bureau ($460), GEICO ($724), State Farm ($735).
  8. Jacksonville - FLorida (annual rate): FL Farm Bureau ($380), GEICO ($598), State Farm ($604)
  9. Orlando - Florida (annual rate): FL Farm Bureau ($431), GEICO ($734), Travelers ($821).
  10. Tallahassee - Florida (annual rate): FL Farm Bureau ($320), GEICO ($469), State Farm ($495).

Be grateful for those who live in Jacksonville and Tallahassee which have the lowest rates in terms of car insurance quotes. If your city isn't listed, please contact us to get the latest quotes.
Car insurance companies really hate teen drivers getting added to the policy, here's how bad:

Car insurance companies really hate teen drivers getting added to the policy, here's how bad:

In California, the average policy goes up 88.57 percent.

 That's 14th in the country with New Hampshire leading the increase of 114.92 percent when adding a teen driver.

 In Hawaii where state laws limit an insurance company from considering age and gender, the increase is only 16.83 percent.

http://www.nbclosangeles.com/news/california/Wheel-of-Misfortune-Teenage-Insurance-Costs-307488311.html?_osource=SocialFlowFB_LABrand

The answer to car accident cold callers is in the air tonight

IT MIGHT be the middle of summer but it’s a frosty January night that’s haunting me at the moment.

Regular readers might remember that about 18 months ago, my misfortunate Mondeo got pranged up the backside by a BMW that failed to stop in time. The crumpled repmobile was a write-off, but I was unharmed and got a cheque in the post for the damage. To be honest, I’d totally forgotten about it. Unfortunately, as it turns out, the world of telemarketing hasn’t.

It used to be occasional but now different call centres are calling – sometimes as often as four times as day – demanding to know why I haven’t taken out the compensation I’m owed for something that happened 18 months ago. They’re not interested when I politely explain I wasn’t injured. Nope, my neck doesn’t creak in pain when I get up in the morning, and I definitely don’t want to make my insurance – and yours, for that matter – even more expensive for claiming compo for an injury I clearly don’t have.

Not good enough, they reckon. So they ring back, over and over again, hoping I’ll change my mind. It is infuriating, particularly when their numbers – which usually purport to be from call centres in Manchester and Liverpool – don’t accept calls coming back the other way.

Seeing as I’ve asked them to remove my number from their database – which they’ve point blank refused – I’ve got creative instead. Sometimes I’ll read them extracts of poetry or road tests from Auto Express. Sometimes I’ll slip into my schoolboy French and test my ability at ordering baguettes from the nearest boulingerie. My latest wheeze is to regale them with my cover versions of Phil Collins’ greatest hits. In The Air Tonight is particularly good at getting personal injury compensation firms to hang up!

In all seriousness though, I know I’m not the only one being harassed and hounded by these companies – a quick straw poll of my fellow Facebookers the other day revealed a litany of fellow motorists whose lives are being made a misery by cold callers who’ve been given access to your insurance details.

They are rude, won’t take no for an answer and insist on going over what can be very unpleasant motoring memories, over and over again. Their nasty brand of pressuring people over the phone is also part of the reason so many spurious whiplash claims are being chased – something even the Transport Committee down at Westminster reckons is a big problem.

The best advice I can offer to anyone in the same boat is get your number registered with the Telephone Preference Service.That or brush up on your karaoke skills for when the call inevitably comes. I think next week my friends at the call centre will be treated to The Human League’s back catalogue!

Cheapest Car Insurance in Ohio | Top 10 Companies

Car Junkie - Cheapest Car Insurance in Ohio - Today's cool news would be, "Who has / what's the cheapest car insurance in Ohio?". Ohio is a large state with abundant choices of auto insurance companies, while as other states in the U.S., the rates are also varying. After observing a few trusted resources we have finally found the top 10 providers offering the cheapest car insurance in Ohio.

The first cheapest one is GEICO, costs only $428 per year. Though the complaint ratio is not as lowest as its quotes, but GEICO is well known for the most friendly auto insurance company not only in Ohio, which means it costs very competitively along the United States. Second, USAA, affordably costs a driver about $527 annually. Farmers comes as the third cheapest with $630-per-year rate. The next cheapest one are Auto Owners ($654), State Farm ($665), American Family ($804), Ameriprise ($835), Allstate ($878), Liberty Mutual ($888) and the last cheapest one is Amica with $912.

As you have seen that those 10 cheapest auto insurance companies provide you less than $1000. That's what we can call "affordable" for anyone. There are others also offering low prices such as California Casualty, Nationwide, MetLife and Mercury. They all have inexpensive quotes under $2,000.

auto insurance ohio
10 Providers in Ohio with the most affordable Auto Insurance Rates


One thing you should notice is that the mentioned rates above might come differently depending on which city you live in. When you live in a city with less population, especially countryside cities, the rates are relatively cheaper than other big cities with large populations. To give you more specific comparison, below we have listed a number of the cheapest auto insurance providers based on cities across the Ohio States.

As the biggest part of Ohio, Columbus is inhabited over 785,000 occupants. The annual rate average of auto insurance comes at $741, that means at least 7 to 9 percent more expensive compared with other big cities in the OH. Our analysis shows that the GEICO and USAA provide the most affordable. Based on our first data, this is relevant to it. So if you live in the Columbus City, consider these two companies.

Cleveland: The city is rated as one of the most expensive auto insurance charge. It averagely costs a driver $900 in one year, and Yes, it's higher than in Ohio. Some companies recommended would still be the USAA and GEICO, while Grande Mutual and State Farm are coming as the third and fourth cheapest insurers across the Cleveland City. The premium packages might come almost twofold higher than the regular ones.

The third biggest city with up to three hundred thousand inhabitants live in, the Cincinnati City has quite lower rates in terms of auto insurance compared to the two cities we have mentioned above with about $720 annually. Three companies to recommend are GEICO, USAA and Grange Mutual. Those companies provide about 30 percent cheaper than the average rates.

Akron: As the fourth biggest city in OH, the annual cost average stands at $800. Despite the city is not the largest part of Ohio, its auto insurance rates are somehow more expensive, even compared to the Columbus. Consider the three providers mentioned above.

Other cities with annual average rates: Brunswick ($556/year), Bowling Green ($580/year), Findlay ($570/year), Mentor ($594/year), Youngstown ($935/year), Lakewood ($917/year), Euclid ($920/year).

Those are the companies with the cheapest car insurance in Ohio and annual average rates of auto insurance from the 11 biggest cities in the Ohio State, now find the best for you.

Tags: auto insurance companies, cheap car insurance, cheap car insurance quotes, cheap car insurance Florida, cheap full coverage car insurance.

Fiat's new lease deal for the 500 is young at heart



FIAT is pitching a new lease deal on its 500 to teenage motorists who would otherwise struggle with the cost of insuring their first car.

The company’s i-DEAL scheme, agreed jointly between the Italian manufacturer and Carrot, an insurance firm, allows drivers as young as 18 to drive a brand new 500 fitted with a telematics system which encourages them to drive more safely.

The three year deal costs £239 a month to take part in. While it’s not the cheapest way to get motoring at the age of 18 – there are of course, telematic monitoring systems which can already be fitted to secondhand cars – it’s ideal for parents who want their offspring to start their motoring career in a safe, hassle-free way.

Karl Howkins, Commercial Director for FIAT Chrysler UK, said: “This all-inclusive insurance package deal will make the dream of driving a brand new FIAT 500 a reality for many young drivers who would otherwise be forced to drive an older and potentially less reliable and safe vehicle.”

To find out more go to the new website covering the Fiat 500 insurance deal.

Farewell, Ford Mondeo

FORGET oil, diamonds or the mysterious underground gas that's been getting you so fracking angry lately. I reckon the world’s most valuable commodity is attention.

Studies have shown that while attention occurs naturally in all human brains – even the ones of reality TV stars – it runs out completely if you try to mine it for more than about 45 minutes or so. Once that’s gone, all you’re left with a dangerous void of mentally planning your next holiday, pondering the plot of Sherlock and wondering whether you really did lock your front door when you left the house this morning.

Even a few seconds of not having an abundant supply of attention at your disposal can cause all sorts of problems. I know this, because that’s roughly how long it took for another driver to write my FordMondeo off beyond repair.

Regular readers might recall how proud I was to finally depart the 1990s and plump my posterior onto the leather lined throne of something modern for a change. The 2.0 litre Ghia X might have been 12 years old but it came stashed with an armada of gizmos so extensive it’d make viewers of The Gadget Show proud. Electric seats and an electric sunroof. Cruise control and a six CD autochanger. It had all of these things, and just about everything else besides.

Yet none of these gadgets could have prevented its fate on that dark evening in deepest Peterborough, as I gradually drew to a stop on the approach to a roundabout somewhere near the A1. The only clue I had that a rather rushed sales manager was about to indulge in a spot of creative parking – as in parking his company 3-Series half a foot into the Mondeo’s rear bumper – was the fleeting glimpse of a set of headlights in the rear view mirror, racing towards me through the darkness.

It is, to my mind, the worst kind of collision you can be involved in; the sort which you can do absolutely nothing about, other than watch it happen. You can be the best driver in the world (which, incidentally, I’m definitely not) and it still isn’t going to stop an errant Audi ploughing into your pride and joy. 

For the sake of driving too fast, too close and not nearly attentively enough, you end up causing weeks of headaches for people you’ve never met. In fact, having a car written off through no fault of my own is getting off lucky; what would have happened if Beemer Boy had been doing the full 70mph he was legally entitled to on that stretch of road?

So the Mondeo is gone. Luckily, I’m not.

Meanwhile in Russia sets a dangerous UK precedent

HOPE you’ve enjoyed a pleasant week’s motoring, bereft of bumps and scratches. Meanwhile, in Russia, footage of a fishtailing Lada has been uploaded to YouTube for your evening entertainment.

You can’t have failed to notice the sheer quantity of clips being uploaded to YouTube of Russians crashing things, badly filmed by dashcams of family saloons slogging their way through a snowdrift somewhere in Siberia. This compelling concoction of spins, rolls and crashes – think of it as sort of You’ve Been Framed meets Police Camera Action, with added Moscowprofanity – has proven so popular that petrolheads over here now happily use #meanwhileinrussia as a hashtag on Twitter.

If you don’t know what a hashtag is, get your children to fire up YouTube and enjoy someone else’s motoring misfortune to while away a few idle minutes. It is weirdly compelling for the same reason that you’ll always slow down on the motorway to gawp at a car crash.

Yet what worries me isn’t these clips’ weirdly addictive edge. It’s that the things which make them possible – those crude, dashboard-mounted cameras – are becoming increasingly fashionable over here too.

Already I know of one court case which involved a lorry driver whose dashboard camera proved an unfortunate meeting between his cab and motorcyclist wasn’t his fault. As a result of this and the increasing appetite for the insurance companies to have our every movement monitored – black boxes, anyone – dashboard camera sales are booming in the UK. You might even get one under the tree this Christmas.

While the idea behind them has an appeal – film your drive to work, so you can prove it was the prat in the Audi A3 who drove into your front bumper at 40mph – I can’t help but wonder if we’re unintentionally creating Channel Four’s next comedy series for them, free of charge.

At the moment at least, there’s precious little to prevent these clips escaping into cyberspace, where spotty teenagers will be able to compile them into amusing ten minute videos, which will amuse office workers in Moscow endlessly. The clips will be just as morbidly compelling, but with fewer errant Ladas involved. Being involved in a crash, for whatever reason, is frightening enough, but knowing it’ll sit on YouTube for the rest of eternity or be forever repeated on Britain’s Best Car Crashes is something else altogether.


Meanwhile in Russia, for now, has a certain crude ring to it, but Meanwhile in Formby is a scarier prospect altogether.

New classic car insurance proposals are a step in the right direction

CLASSIC car connoisseurs of the younger variety are being promised some good news by a company specialising in insurance cover for their prized machines.

Footman James announced at the Classic Industry Forum, held this week at the Heritage Motor Centre in Gaydon, that it's come up with a new set of terms and conditions for enthusiasts aged between 17 and 23, which aim to make the dream of owning and running a classic car more accessible to genuine petrolheads.

Andy Fairchild, the company's managing director, said: "We have been working hard with our insurance partners to establish a range of criteria that will assist us identify the true classic enthusiast.  Young drivers who purchase classic vehicles as a means of obtaining cheaper insurance are not, in our opinion, true classic enthusiasts and a risk that insurers will not take on – a decision that we fully support."

"One of the ways of establishing true enthusiasts, in our opinion, is down to whether they are members of a car club.  We have, therefore, selected this as the primary qualifying criteria for the product and as a result, the product will initially be available to members of pre-selected clubs only."

As someone who's struggled with classic car policies before, and known of a case where a young enthusiast's quote for a classic Mini shot up from £600 to an eyewatering four grand overnight due to a company's change of underwriter, I'm supportive of any efforts to make classic cars more accessible to a new generation of genuine enthusiasts, rather than just cost-cutting youngsters who see classics as a way of cutting corners on their car insurance.

So, what's at stake for young enthusiasts? For the new terms and conditions, which come into effect next month, the company say enthusiasts must meet the following criteria:
  •     The owner must be a member of one of the pre-selected clubs
  •     The car must have been manufactured in or before 1985
  •     The owner must have use of or own a second vehicle for everyday use.
  •     The owner must limit their mileage to 3000 or 5000 miles per year.
  •     The owner must have a maximum of one non-fault claim or minor conviction.
  •     The car must be parked off the road or garaged
Which seems fair enough (although how that'll help one girl I know, who owns a 1972 Mini as her only car but who otherwise meets all of Footman's criteria, I've no idea), particularly as it'd stop the scourge of "crash-for-cash" one insurance expert told me about - teenagers buying a classic car on the cheap, crashing it deliberately and then hammering the insurance companies for the resultant compensation. Classic car insurance, logically, should be for classic car enthusiasts - people who cherish their old cars, no matter how old the owners themselves are.

However, the acid test will be whether what Footman - and, no doubt, other classic insurers when they inevitably follow suit - are proposing actually translates into cheaper and more accessible cover for genuine classic car fans who are being hammered through no real fault of their own.

Classic cars are a passion which we twentysomethings are happy to pay out for, but not when it's over the odds.

Are you a young classic car owner who's struggling to get cover? Let us know what you think of the proposals by sending an email to david.simister@hotmail.co.uk or by leaving a comment below...

My classic car insurance nightmare

ALL I got from the world of car insurance was the ambient noise of a call centre. That and a helping of Fleetwood Mac after being put on hold again.

I've written before about the mental mindfield that is insuring your motor. I moaned about how a company refused to accept two claim-free policies held consecutively over 24 months as being a legit two years' no claims. I've pondered why it is premiums only ever seem to go up, and I've reported that even the Government have probed the murky workings of this strange industry.

So I wasn't surprised when I discovered the renewal quote for the classic car policy covering my MGB GT had gone up. Again.

Even though I'd been tootling to and from car shows for the best part of two years without so much as a scratch the cost of a year's cover had gone up by £30 from last year, which was itself £30 more than the year before that. I know full well that classic policies don't accrue a No Claims Bonus in the same way as your run-of-the-mill policy would - that's part of the reason why it's so much cheaper - and £200 a year's hardly a deal breaker, but in the interests of getting even a slightly better deal I thought I'd do a bit of shopping around.

First call was to my insurer's chief rival, who said they were sure they'd be able to find me a better deal and immediately fired off the questionnaire you always get when phoning for cover. A quick blast of Fleetwood Mac after being put on hold later and they had the answer; it was £150 dearer. Not surprisingly, I politely declined.

But here's the interesting bit - rather than sound apologetic and let me get on with my Saturday afternoon, they put me through to another insurance company, who gave me the standard insurance questionnaire a second time, and when they couldn't find me a quote, they put me through to another insurance company. It was like a bizarre game of Pass The Parcel, where someone racking up a huge phone bill has to be passed around before the music - Fleetwood Mac, which seems to be the soft rock band of choice for people putting you on hold - stopped playing.

After 35 minutes on the phone, I was getting just a little bit annoyed. So you can imagine how I felt when insurance salesman number four offered me "a competitive quote" of just £520. I'll say that again - a "competitive" quote of just £320 more than I'd started with. I was furious, particularly when I pointed to him out my renewal quote was less than half the price of what he was offering.

"Is it really?," he replied sarcastically.

Don't get me wrong. I've nothing against the principle of car insurance - it's a legal requirement and you can, after all, never be too careful - but the way the industry operates makes little to no sense. These are the same people who refused to acknowledge my better half's six years of faultless driving because it wasn't British enough, and the same ones who upped the price of covering a mate's souped-up Mini from £600 to an eye-watering four grand because they'd changed their underwriter. They're the same people who once asked another pal for £8,500 to insure a Ford Capri worth less than £500 when he bought it, so it shouldn't really surprise me that, in their eyes at least, a £520 quote is "competitive" to someone who's been offered exactly the same thing for £200.

I couldn't help but conclude the UK's car insurance industry isn't a group of people or companies but just a single mysterious machine, bereft of common sense. It made no difference to them that I'm a member of the Institute of Advanced Motorists, have four years of No Claims Bonus on my everyday motor and only ever use the MGB for smoking to shows and back. As far as they were concerned I was a journalist (one of the highest risk professions there is), a twentysomething (one of the most dangerous ages to be) and a male (which used to mean I was the most dangerous gender, until a European court ruling forced them to think otherwise).

It finally came to a head last night, when yet another insurance company rang me up, didn't even give me enough time to tell them I was in work and would they mind calling me later on, and immediately put me on hold for another helping of Fleetwood Mac's finest.

I hung up.

Incidentally I'm a huge fan of Fleetwood Mac - Rumours is one of my favourite albums. I just resent the car insurance world using Don't Stop and Dreams as their phone holding tunes of choice...

Owning a Jaguar XJR is a stupid idea, no matter how cheap the insurance

THE woman from Confused sounded a bit, well, confused. When would I be interested in taking up insurance on a supercharged V8 Jaguar?

It's very nearly November, which in the Life On Cars household means enduring the expensive ordeal of insuring both a £300 Rover and a Mazda MX-5 at roughly the same time. With each year of driving around and not claiming for the cost of a crumpled heap of metal in a hedge my insurance has got a little bit cheaper, but I'm still paying more the cost of a year's insurance for the ancient Rover than the cost of the car itself.
Slightly depressed by that realisation, I turned to that opium of car enthusiasts, eBay, and immediately came up with a far more suitable banger. All 3.2 litres of a Jaguar XJ8, and mine for £750. I very nearly headed for the Buy It Now button, but then I clocked the wheelarch rot and a service history with more gaps than a jeans shop. So I moved on to the next offering.

Big mistake - I'd found a tidy T-reg Jaguar XJR, which back in the day would have set golfers back a cool £51,000 but was here, in the great Arthur Daley forecourt of cyberspace, for £1,750. True, it had 124,000 miles on the clock but it looked to be in good nick, and the thought of having 370bhp at my leather-lined, wood-trimmed disposal seemed tempting enough to look past the prospect of getting less than 20 to the gallon. It is, Jag people will know, a fabulous car; refined and graceful enough to wear the Big Cat badge with pride, but blessed with a 4.0 litre V8, beefy alloy wheels and sports trim and suspension for added zestfulness. Petrolhead heaven, basically.

Drunk with delight, I idiotically went to an insurance comparision website to find out how much it'd cost a twentysomething male working in journalism - which in insurance terms is about as dangerous a profession as they come - to make sure it was beyond my aspirations of automotive avarice. It wasn't. Someone as hamfisted as me could insure Coventry's finest, fully comp, for a shade over a grand, which unlike the Rover is less than the car itself cost.

I woke up the following morning and knocked the idea on the head, having realised in the cold light of day that having a supercharged Jag outside the house would be a stupid, expensive idea.

The only problem is, the insurance companies keep ringing me up now and suggesting otherwise!

UPDATE: An earlier version of this article included a picture of the special edition XJR 100 rather than the standard XJR. This has since been amended.

More training for young drivers is a good idea, but then so is cheaper insurance

WORDSWORTH might have written things differently if he were reincarnated as 17-year-old in 2012, trying to get fully comp on a secondhand Fiesta. Bliss was it in that dawn to be alive, but to be young was very expensive.

Impoverished young poets need not worry though, for help is at hand. That august body, the Association of British Insurers, has come up with some new suggestions to stop 17-25 year olds, who make up an eighth of Britain's motorists but of a third of those killed in car crashes. They're also, by and large, the most likely drivers to be a bit skint and yet the ones who get hammered the most by the singing man from the Go Compare ads.

In a nutshell, the ABI would like to ban intensive learner driving courses, insist that all youngsters spend at least a year at driving school, with the option to start at 16-and-a-bit, and that for the first six months they aren't allowed to take their mates out with them. Oh, and the amount of alcohol they'll be allowed to have their system will be absolutely none. Zilch. Not a drop.

Having vivid memories of being driven by a tailgating teenager in a cream-crackered Peugeot 206 down the M6 on a snowy day one winter, I can completely understand why the ABI are so keen on bringing in measures which effectively protect younger drivers from themselves. I'm old and wise enough to understand the benefits of things like defensive driving, but I'm still young enough to recall some of the extortionate figures insurance companies asked me when I tried to get a quote for a Mini 1000 which could barely crack seventy.

I reckon it's got to work both ways. Sure, I'm all for 17-year-olds learning more about their driving - in fact, chuck in a few Scandinavian-style lessons about car control while we're at it - but those who pass what'd be a far harder test should be rewarded with realistic premiums they can actually afford. To be fair to the ABI, they say they'd like to reward younger drivers with lower premiums, but really they should be actively encouraging it rather than passively saying how nice it'd be. Carrot, stick, and all that.

It'd be good to see new drivers spending the money they're spending now on ballooning car insurance on, say, decent tyres. The line "I understeered lonely as a cloud" doesn't really have a ring to it...

Looking for classic car insurance

A couple of days back there was a story in the British press about a vintage Bugatti while had been found in a garage under piles of rubbish. Apparently the car is estimated to get about £100,000 in an auction. What is even more amazing is that the car is not even an authentic one but a good replica model Bugatti Type 51. This story shows the level of interest generated by some of these vintage models.

1931 Bugatti Type 51
Originally posted to Flickr by Brian Snelson

Some people collect really vintage models, spending time and money to maintain and keep them running. They even go to the extent of building new engines based on original plans as there are no one selling the replacement parts anymore.

However, the term "classic cars" can be very misleading. The AARP classic car insurance site defines these as those vehicles which are 10 or more years old and differentiates them from Antique auto which refer to autos more than 25 years old.

The great thing about driving cars more than five years old in the US is that you actually pay less car insurance as compared to newer cars.

So if you have 10 years or more old car, there are some great discounts out there and special offers which allows you to get even more affordable classic and antique Auto Insurance coverage.

It's official. Car insurance is a rip off

AN MP and Life On Cars reader described excessive industry charges for car insurance as ‘dispicable and absolutely criminal'.

Southport MP John Pugh said he was calling for residents who'd been hit hard by excessively quotes and premiums to get in touch with him after he was shocked by the findings of a survey by the Office of Fair Trading found that insurers and garages were working to drive up prices and that the cost of getting cover had gone up in some cases by as much as 40%.

Mr Pugh said this week: “This sort of behaviour is despicable at the best of times, but in a recession when people are struggling to make ends meet, it’s absolutely criminal. "I've heard tales of courtesy cars being provided for a man who broke both legs in an accident and people who have been out of the country on holiday because it pays insurers to do a deal on with hire firms. There is clearly something rotten in the state of the car insurance market. The ordinary motorist is picking up the tab and it is about time action was taken.

"I would therefore like to ask Southport residents to send me their car insurance ”horror stories“ to submit as evidence to the Competition Commission. This is a great opportunity to clean up the car insurance market, and the more damning the weight of evidence the better."

Mr Pugh also cited the example of one of his constituents being charged £26,000 to insure a secondhand Citroen Saxo, despite the car itself being worth £1,000. The commission, led by Merseyside MP Louise Ellman, said that following the results of the OFT investigation that she was now looking forward to the Competition Commission working to reform the car insurance industry, and said evidence suggested that insurers, claims management firms, solicitors were exploiting motorists and inflating premiums.

"We found evidence to support the view that various features of the private motor insurance market prevent, restrict or distort adequate competition in ways that do not deliver a fair deal to motorists. The OFT’s provisional decision to refer the highly dysfunctional UK market in private motor insurance and related goods or services to the Competition Commission for full investigation is a major step forward.

"Like the OFT, we found evidence to support the view that various features of the private motor insurance market prevent, restrict or distort adequate competition in ways that do not deliver a fair deal to motorists. I will propose to the Transport Committee that we participate in the consultation announced today to make the strongest possible case for the referral. I now expect car insurers and the other firms involved to co-operate fully with all stages of this process."

If you live in the Southport area, MP John Pugh would like to hear your car insurance horror stories. Share them with us by sending an email to david.simister@champnews.com or leave a comment below, and we'll pass on any correspondence to John Pugh MP. Please include your contact details.


A FEW tips on how to avoid getting stung by excessive car insurance quotes:

 • Shop around and don't go for the first quote you find. With plenty of price comparision websites offering quotes from a wide variety of insurers, you can avoid paying over the odds.

 • Sharpen up your skills. Motoring organisations like the Institute of Advanced Motorists often offer their own insurance schemes for those who pass safer driving courses, meaning you'll not only be less likely to have an accident but quids in too.

 • Swallow your pride and avoid sporty, high-powered cars if you're keen to save on insurance costs. In the 1980s there was a long-running joke that GTI stood for Guaranteed Theft Item, but it had its basis in truth. Lots of people like hot hatches, sports cars and off-roaders... including car thieves.

 • Consider whether you really need to claim. If your car's only lightly damaged, there's a chance the rise in your premium if you claim will actually be more than the cost of getting it repaired at your expense.

 • Tell your insurer too much rather than too little - they're often able to offer you discounts on things by offering you specialised policies, such as if you own more than one car. Oh, and don't lie - insurers will often refuse to stump up if they find any discrepancies.

 • If you're smitten with an older model consider a classic car policy, which have more stringent limits on mileage but can save you money compared to more conventional insurance.

 • Don't insure it in your sister's or your girlfriend's name. Not only is this technically fraud but the savings women have been getting over men are set to outlawed later this year anyway, after an EU judge argued that female quotes being cheaper than male ones was a form of gender discrimination.

 • Don't pay monthly unless you have to. It might seem more manageable but in most cases it'll actually cost you more, so you might as well stump up and pay it off it one go.

 • Be alarmed - not with the cost of car insurance, but in terms of how secure your motor is. Fitting a device like a Tracker or beefing up your car security might be pricey, but often insurers will offer you cheaper insurance as a result.

 • Don't be a journalist. Reporters, and other professions like estate agents, sales reps, and entertainers are all considered more likely to claim, and have to pay more as a result.

Why using ANPR to catch out insurance cheats at petrol stations will never work


CONFESSION time, then, chaps and chapettes. Who out of this week's readers is driving around without their car insurance being up to scratch?

Apparently, just under 10% of the region's motorists are driving around without bothering with the pesky business of paying for cover, which means statistically at least one of you hasn't gone got any. After all, insurance is unbelievably expensive these days. It's also almost completely unfathomable and sold to you by an opera tenor who unites people from all walks of life because they all, without exception, would love nothing more than to have him removed from our TV screens for good.

Car insurance is confusing and expensive and as a result loads of you just can't be bothered with it. Even the Government, as I've mentioned previously, realise it.

Yet Whitehall's latest idea to crack down on the uninsured drivers - which I'm absolutely not one of, by the way - isn't going to work because while it's good in principle, it's got more holes than one of Jamie Oliver's colanders. As a bit of a self-confessed Dragons' Den addict, I just know that if it was some young business boffin's invention it'd be shot to pieces with just a handful of snide remarks from Duncan Bannatyne and a bad joke from Peter Jones. However, it's the Government who are suggesting it, so I will at least try to take it seriously.

In essence, they're on about fitting ANPR cameras, which can recognise car numberplates, to every petrol station in the country in a bid to spot uninsured cars as they pull in to fill up. The technology, which already works a treat on police cars, will then automatically tell the petrol pumps not to give the offending driver any fuel. And presumably give Plod a bell at the same time.

It's a great idea in principle but - Bannatyne mode activated - it will be horrendously expensive in practice, and it'd have to fitted to each and every one of Britain's 8,000 or so filling stations across the land. It'd also encourage even more crooks to clone car numberplates, siphoning would shoot up, and I can just see the court case where the one law-abiding driver, who the cameras clock by mistake, successfully sues for defamation after the system insinuates he's an insurance cheat.

It is, for all those reasons and a couple of others I can't squeeze into one Life On Cars column, a badly-thought out waste of what is basically YOUR money.

I'm out.

The great British insurance ripoff


LIFE ON CARS has been innundated this week with responses from readers who say they are being crippled by the soaring cost of car insurance.

Last week we reported on a Commons enquiry which has been set up to investigate the rising cost of premiums, particularly for younger drivers, and residents from across the region have got in touch to share their thoughts on the issue.

Maureen Gladhill reported difficulties in getting quotes for her two daughters, and said:

"I feel that it is onerous and extremely difficult to pass a driving test nowadays and yet the greedy insurers still penalise young drivers, I feel so sorry for our young people, hammered with extortionate tuition fees, no job prospects and hammered by the insurance industry, it is about time for a parliamentary enquiry.

"I expect the insurers will claim the amount of claims (fraudulent or otherwise) account for premium increases, but I know that the government has tightened up on no win no fee with the new insurance portal system, so come on."

Last week a Transport Select Committee was set up in Westminster to look at the cost of car insurance, armed with new research which suggests a whopping 96% of younger drivers feel they are being "priced off the road" due to high insurance premiums.

A reader from Maghull, who did not wish to be named, agreed with that view and said:

"I fear these insurance companies are seeing an easy target within the driving community not only with young drivers but all drivers in general.

"All in all its a complete rip off. Not only for being young, male, female the car you drive but also dependent where you live. You are discriminated for where you live which I also feel is totally unacceptable. It's a joke and although i dont agree with having no insurance and driving around, I can see why it's an option. The insurance companies need a strip tearing from them and told to drop their prices."

The car insurance industry responded to the Parliamentary enquiry by saying that the rise in claims from personal injury lawsuits and an increase in uninsured driving had helped to drive costs up.

Otto Thoresen, director general of the Association of British Insurers, said:

"Rising claims costs from personal injury claims, excessive legal costs, insurance fraud and uninsured driving, coupled with lower investment returns in recent years, have unfortunately led to rising motor insurance bills for many customers.

"In fact the motor insurance sector has not been profitable for the last sixteen years because the amount paid out in claims and expenses has been greater than that received in premiums."

Younger motorists have reported paying premiums which are hundreds - if not thousands - of pounds in order to get insured, which has led to worries being discussed at the committee that increasing numbers of motorists are resorting to driving with no insurance at all.

Sue Bruce was another parent who complained of crippling prices to insure her children, and told Life On Cars:

"I have paid £3,500 for my 18 year old son to be on the road in this Citroen C1 which incidentally is not much more than the car cost. I do appreciate that the insurance companies have to cover themselves for the small amount of young people that do drive erratic on the roads, but when my daughter passed her test the insurance was £1,900 which is a big difference.

"Maybe these insurance companies. could come up with some kind of scheme where they would accept the driver paying monthly then earning some kind of a no claims bonus month by month therefore making it more affordable for young drivers to get on the road."

Is car insurance for the young too expensive?


A PARLIAMENTARY committee led by a Liverpool MP has come to the same conclusion most motorists already know; that car insurance is crippingly expensive for younger drivers.

This week the Transport Select Committee has reopened its inquiry into the cost of car insurance, armed with new research which suggests a whopping 96% of younger drivers feel they are being “priced off the road” due to high insurance premiums.

Liverpool Riverside MP Louise Ellman, the committee's chairperson, said:

“I am extremely concerned about these results, which show that young drivers think they are being priced off the road because of the high cost of motor insurance. It is shocking that so many young drivers are considering breaking the law – by driving without insurance or changing the details they provide to insurers – in order to get a cheaper premium.

"It's revealing that most young drivers are also unaware that many insurers receive referral fees in order to deal with claims they make. This highlights why the committee called for referral fees to be made more transparent in its report on the cost of motor insurance earlier this year."

However, insurers continue to charge younger drivers higher prices than their older counterparts, and point to high accident rates to justify them - Department for Transport statistics show that although people under 25 make up just 12% of those on the roads, they're involved in more than a quarter of the accidents.

Are you a younger driver being hit by the cost of insuring your car? Or do you think the accident statistics justify the prices? Share your thoughts by sending an email to david.simister@champnews.com